Live liquidity intelligence across 152 tracked protocols
Liquidity diligence for tokenised asset teams
IntLiq gives investment, risk, and operations teams one shared system for screening tokenised asset protocols, monitoring deterioration, documenting decisions, and shipping data into internal workflows.
AUM monitored
$30.0B
Protocols tracked
152+
Refresh cadence
4h
Delivery surface
UI / API / PDF
Buyer fit
Built for the teams that have to explain liquidity risk, not just observe it
The product is structured around the institutional workflow: screen candidates, monitor live exposures, generate evidence, and move the outputs into systems that the rest of the organization already uses.
Allocators and portfolio managers
Compare protocols before capital is committed. Bring consistent liquidity evidence into allocation memos and investment committee reviews.
- Cross-protocol score comparison
- Committee-ready PDF reports
- Historical score and tier context
Risk and compliance teams
Track structural deterioration before it becomes an incident. Replace fragmented spreadsheet checks with one monitored workflow.
- Watchlist alerts for score and tier moves
- Published methodology and audit trail
- Status, security, and procurement references
Operations and engineering
Push liquidity data into internal tooling instead of rebuilding it. IntLiq exposes the same surface through dashboard, API, webhooks, and export workflows.
- REST API and scoped API keys
- Webhook support on higher tiers
- CSV and JSON export paths
How teams work with IntLiq
One system for monitoring, documentation, and integration
Screen
Use the dashboard to compare protocols by score, tier, trend, and supporting data confidence.
Monitor
Watchlists surface material score and tier changes so teams do not rely on manual checks.
Document
Generate repeatable report outputs for internal review, investment committees, and audit trails.
Integrate
Route the same scoring surface into internal systems through API access, exports, and webhook workflows.
Live coverage
Representative protocols, one shared scoring frame
Scores are designed to give teams one comparable view across protocols before deeper legal, issuer, and contract diligence.
Franklin OnChain U.S. Government Money Fund
IntLiq score
AUM
$360.1M
Yield
5.18%
Composite score
88
Ondo US Dollar Yield
IntLiq score
AUM
$450.2M
Yield
5.10%
Composite score
82
Centrifuge Anemoy Liquid Treasury
IntLiq score
AUM
$260.0M
Yield
7.20%
Composite score
71
Maple Cash Management
IntLiq score
AUM
$125.4M
Yield
8.50%
Composite score
68
Goldfinch Senior Pool
IntLiq score
AUM
$95.3M
Yield
10.10%
Composite score
45
Spiko
IntLiq score
AUM
$1.2B
Yield
--
Composite score
23
Enterprise readiness
Procurement-friendly from first review
Buyers usually ask the same questions early: what the score means, how the system behaves in production, what controls are in place, and how quickly teams can integrate. Those answers are surfaced in the product, not hidden behind a sales process.
Typical rollout path
1. Evaluate
Review public scores, methodology, security posture, and status history before procurement work begins.
2. Pilot
Start with the dashboard and report workflow, then validate watchlists, alerts, and API endpoints against one internal use case.
3. Roll out
Expand into production monitoring, exports, webhooks, and team-based operating procedures once the workflow is accepted.
Security posture
Review implemented controls, access boundaries, and the enterprise evaluation process.
OpenOperational status
See live data freshness, recent incident history, and service commitments in one place.
OpenMethodology
Understand what the score is, what it is not, and how signals are combined.
OpenDeveloper docs
Inspect the API surface, payload conventions, and integration paths before rollout.
OpenBusiness case
The value is workflow compression, not just another data screen
Reduce diligence cycle time
Replace ad hoc spreadsheet reviews with one repeatable workflow for screening, monitoring, and memo preparation.
Improve committee readiness
Bring the same score, supporting context, and methodology reference into every allocation discussion.
Operationalize monitoring
Move from periodic checks to ongoing watchlist coverage with alerting and API-driven handoff to internal systems.
Start how your team buys
Self-serve for exploration. Guided rollout for production teams.
Start with the Observer plan to inspect the product surface. Move to Analyst, Professional, or Institutional when the workflow is ready to support live monitoring and integration.